|CITES BY TOPIC: "National" (citizenship)|
Why you are a "national" or a "state national" and NOT a "U.S. citizen". Article on our website based on sections 4.12.6 and 18.104.22.168 of the Great IRS Hoax book.
TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER I > Sec. 1101.
(a) (22) The term ''national of the United States'' means
(A) a citizen of the United States, or
(B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent [but not necessarily exclusive] allegiance to the United States.
[Code of Federal
CHAPTER I--DEPARTMENT OF
Subpart C_Loss of Nationality
(d) National means a citizen of the United States or a noncitizen owing permanent allegiance to the United States.
(d) United States nationals
This section shall not apply with respect to any United States national.
"national" defined in 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21)
(a) (21) The term ''national'' means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.
Great IRS Hoax, Section 4.6: The Three Definitions of "United States"
Another important distinction needs to be made. Definition 1 [in Hooven and Allison v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945)] refers to the country “United States”, but this country is not a “nation”, in the sense of international law. This very important point was made clear by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1794 in the case of Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall. (U.S.) 419, 1 L.Ed. 440 (1794), when it said:
This is a case of uncommon magnitude. One of the parties to it is a State; certainly respectable, claiming to be sovereign. The question to be determined is, whether this State, so respectable, and whose claim soars so high, is amenable to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States? This question, important in itself, will depend on others, more important still; and, may, perhaps, be ultimately resolved into one, no less radical than this 'do the people of the United States form a Nation?'
A cause so
conspicuous and interesting, should be carefully and accurately viewed
from every possible point of sight. I shall examine it; 1st. By the
principles of general jurisprudence. 2nd. By the laws and practice of
particular States and Kingdoms. From the law of nations little or no illustration of this subject can be
expected. By that law the several States and Governments spread over our
globe, are considered as forming a society, not a NATION.
It has only been by a very few comprehensive minds, such as those of
Elizabeth and the Fourth Henry, that this last great idea has been even
contemplated. 3rdly. and chiefly, I shall examine the important question
before us, by the Constitution of the United States, and the legitimate
result of that valuable instrument.
Black’s Law Dictionary further clarifies the distinction between a nation and a society by clarifying the the differences between a national government and a federal government, and keep in mind that our government is called “federal government”:
“NATIONAL GOVERNMENT. The government of a whole nation, as distinguished form that of a local or territorial division of the nation, and also as distinguished form that of a league or confederation.
national government is a government of the people of a single state or
nation, united as a community by what is termed the “social compact,’
and possessing complete and perfect supremacy over persons and things, so
far as they can be made the lawful objects of civil government.
A federal government is distinguished from a national government
by its being the government of a community of independent and sovereign
states, united by compact.” Piqua
Branch Bank v. Knoup, 6 Ohio St. 393.”
So the “United States*” the country is a “society” and a “sovereignty” but not a “nation” under the law of nations, by the Supreme Court’s own admission. Because the supreme Court has ruled on this matter, it is now incumbent upon each of us to always remember it and to apply it in all of our dealings with the Federal Government. If not, we lose our individual Sovereignty by default and the Federal Government assumes jurisdiction over us. So, while a sovereign Citizen will want to be the third type of Citizen and on occasion the first, he would never want to be the second.
"2. Nationality and citizenship are not entirely synonymous; one can be a national of the United States and yet not a citizen. 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(22). The distinction has little practical impact today, however, for the only remaining noncitizen nationals are residents of American Samoa and Swains Island. See T. Aleinikoff, D. Martin, & H. Motomura, Immigration: Process and Policy 974-975, n. 2 (3d ed. 1995). The provision that a child born abroad out of wedlock to a United States citizen mother gains her nationality has been interpreted to mean that the child gains her citizenship as well; thus, if the mother is not just a United States national, but also a United States citizen, the child is a United States citizen. See 7 Gordon § 93.04[b], p. 93-42; id., § 93.04[d][viii], p. 93-49."
Jose Luis Perdomo-Padilla v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, 9th Cir, No. 01-71454, June 23, 2003-meaning of "national of the United States"
[ Footnote 1 ] The Civil Service Commission's regulations, 5 CFR 338.101 (1976), provide in pertinent part:
|Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship||Last revision: 8/16/09|
|This private system is NOT subject to monitoring|